What conclusion can you draw from the following statements using the Law of Syllogism? • If a figure is a square, then it has four sides.
• If a figure has four sides, then it is not a triangle

The potions for the answer is in the photo

Using the Law of Syllogism, the conclusion that you can draw from the two given premises is: C. If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle.

The law of Syllogism is a method of deductive reasoning which involves drawing a conclusion from two premises.

Applying this law, there are usually three statements.

The first and second statements are the premises. The first statement is the major premise that connects to the second statement.The third statement is the conclusion derived from the two premises stated earlier.For example:

Statement 1: If a, then b (premise)

Statement 2: If b then c (premise)

Statement 3: If a, the c (conclusion)

In the question above, in the same vein, from the first and second statement, we can conclude that:

If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle, because a square has 4 sides and a triangle doesn't.

Therefore, using the Law of Syllogism, the conclusion that you can draw from the two given premises is: C. If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle.

Learn more about the Law of Syllogism here:

link

False because how does that work?

Cisco co cop hop h0 cop go srry cop hop h0 d8