HELP PLEASE! 20 POINTS AND WILL MARK BRAINLIEST. Suppose you want to find the 40th term of a sequence. Would you rather use a recursive rule or an explicit rule? Explain your reasoning.

I'd rather use an explicit rule for bigger values of n

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose we have a sequence like:

6,14,22,30,..

And we wanted to calculate the 200th term. The recursive rule is:

Since each term is 8 more than the previous term. If we wanted to caclulate the term n=200, we would need to go up to 200 one-by-one until reaching the desired value.

The explicit rule is:

To find the term for n=200, just substitute into the rule:

Thus, I'd rather use an explicit rule for bigger values of n

options a,b,c are the right answer.

step-by-step explanation:

a linear parent function is always represented as y = x

if we write this function in the form of y=mx+c

⇒

or  

now if we plot a graph we will find these characteristics:

1) y intercept of the graph is zero so its a straight line passing through origin.

2) as we can see in both the forms of function written, values of x and y may be either positive or negative for the positive slope means points on the graph are either in first quadrant or in third one.

3) it's slope is one.

54.864 meters

step-by-step explanation: