The data are yearly skin cancer rates (cases per 100,000 people) in Connecticut, with a code identifying those years that came two years after higher than average sunspot activity and those years that came two years after lower than average sunspot activity. (Data from D. F. Andrews and A. M. Herzberg, Data, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.) Is there any reason to suspect that using the two independent sample t -test to compare skin cancer rates in the two groups is inappropriate?

b

step-by-step explanation:

hi there, i would be interested to you with your test, may you add the questions and answer options.

- : )

in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶

step-by-step explanation:

population of los angeles = 3.79 × 10⁶

population of california = 9.84 × population of los angeles

                                        = 9.84 × 3.79 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.2936 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.29 × 10⁶

∴ in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶