Lynn wants to multiply 44 × 305. She says that all she has to do is find 4 × 305 and then double that number. Which explains whether or not Lynn’s method will give her the correct answer?

Lynn's method will give her the correct answer.
Multiplying by 4 and then doubling the product is the same as multiplying by 44.

Lynn's method will not give her the correct answer.
Multiplying by 4 and then doubling the product is the same as multiplying by 6, not by 44.

Lynn's method will not give her the correct answer.
Multiplying by 4 and then doubling the product is the same as multiplying by 8, not by 44.

Lynn's method will not give her the correct answer.
Multiplying by 4 and then doubling the product is the same as multiplying by 16, not by 4

Lynn's method will not give her the correct answer.

Multiplying by 4 and then doubling the product is the same as multiplying by 8, not by 44.

Step-by-step explanation:

I just solved the equation of every answer and this is the one that

(305 x 4) x 2= (305 x 8) x 2.

Message me if you don't understand

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.