Which sequence could be partially defined by the recursive formula f (n + 1) = f(n) + 2.5 for n ≥ 1? 2.5, 6.25, 15.625, 39.0625, …
2.5, 5, 10, 20
–10, –7.5, –5, –2.5, …
–10, –25, 62.5, 156.25

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Will give let f(x)=2x and g(x)=[tex]2^{x}[/tex] graph the functions on the same coordinate plane. what are the solutions to the equation f(x)=g(x) ? enter your answers in the boxes x=[? ] or x=[? ]

Awindow washer cleans 42 windows in 2 hours. at this rate, how many windows did he clean in 180 minutes.