Saved Help
Save
4
Complete the following table (assume the overtime for each employee is a time-and-a-half rate after 40 hours): (Do not round
intermediate calculations. Round your "overtime rate" and "gross earnings to the nearest cent.)
Employee
M
T
W
Th
F
Sa
Total regular
Cruz
Total overtime
hours
13
hours
8
10
8
Overtime
rate
6
Regular
rate
$
7.80
2
Gross
earnings

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which shows the correct lengths of side c in both scales? scale 1: 45 m; scale 2: 60 m scale 1: 60 m; scale 2: 45 m scale 1: 36 m; scale 2: 27 m scale 1: 27 m; scale 2: 36 m mark this and return save and exit

Evaluate 3(a + b + c)squared for a = 2, b = 3, and c = 4. a. 54 b. 243 c.729 add solution .