Jeremy is trying to explain why a triangle with side lengths 35, 30, 60 is not a right triangle. His explanation is shown below. Step 1: 35 squared + 30 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 2: (35 + 30) squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 3: 65 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 4: 4,225 not-equals 3,600 Which best describes Jeremy’s explanation? Jeremy’s explanation is accurate. Jeremy’s explanation is inaccurate. He wrote the leg lengths in the incorrect order in step 1. Jeremy’s explanation is inaccurate. He incorrectly combined terms in step 2. Jeremy’s explanation is inaccurate. He multiplied incorrectly in step 4.

i need the table so i can see

step-by-step explanation:

answer:

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left.

step-by-step explanation:

the general equation for the dissociation of a weak base is

b + h₂o   ⇌   bh⁺ + oh⁻

according to le châtelier's principle, when a stress is applied to a system at equilibrium, the system will respond in a way that tends to relieve the stress.

if you apply a stress by adding more bh⁺ or oh⁻,   the system will respond by moving in a direction that gets rid of the added ions.

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left, forming more of the undissociated base.

the equation cos(35) =a/25 can be used to find the length of bc what is the length of bc? round to the nearest tenth

step-by-step explanation:

the rocket cannot penetrate the ground, in a contextual sense, therefore the roots of this equation should be the domain of this function. i'll let you find the roots of this quadratic equation (hint: use the quadratic formula:  

1- c

2-a

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!