Kelley writes the expression n + 2 to model the phrase "Xander studied two more hours than Nandini." Which best explains the accuracy of Kelley's expression?

Following are the solution to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

It was right because the "Two" is "2," "more is" and "+" are two the most hours than Nandini and "n," so 2+n or n+2 is a true, phrase of Nandini's transcription".

Now, this vector n is unknown, so the number of hours Nandini researched should reflect.

Two further hours which Nandini researched Xander. So, Xander studied the number of hours = n + 2 or 2+ n. Kalley has therefore written a correct word.

7! = 7×6×5×4×3×2

3! = 3× 2

as 7! is multiple of 3! because 7! contains 3! that is 3× 2 as factor

so 7! /(3! ) = 7× 6× 5× 4

= 42 × 20

= 840

its b) 840✌✌✌

dhruv⭐

it's d

step-by-step explanation: