subject
Mathematics, 12.11.2020 22:30 maddynichole2017

Vance used the associative property to write (4.5 m + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) minus 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 m (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction minus 9). Did Vance apply the associative property correctly? Why or why not? Yes, the terms with variables should be written first.
Yes, the terms can be regrouped and still be equivalent.
No, the order of the terms should have been changed.
No, the addition symbol was dropped in the second expression.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
Even if a person is in very good shape, applying to be a police officer requires commitment to fitness. applicants must pass a physical fitness test. in order to prepare for the test, janet purchases an activity tracker to court her steps. her goal is to walk 10,000 steps each day. she measures heard average step length to be 30 inches. play janet runs, her average steps length increases to 36 in. how many steps would she have to take to run 1 mile 50280 round to the nearest step
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:40
What is the slope of (0,32) and (100,212)
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
The nth term of a sequence in 2n-1 the nth term of a different sequence is 3n+1 work out 3 numbers that are in bothe sequences and are between 20 and 40
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00
Prove the following(cot0+cosec0)[tex](cot0 + cosec0) { }^{2} = \frac{1 + cos0}{1 - cos0} [/tex]
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Vance used the associative property to write (4.5 m + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) minus 9 as...
Questions
question
History, 09.07.2019 22:00
question
Mathematics, 09.07.2019 22:00
question
Social Studies, 09.07.2019 22:00
question
Mathematics, 09.07.2019 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722361