If j and k are nonzero integers, which pair of points must lie in the same quadrant? (j, j) and (k, k)
(j, k) and (jk, jk)
(j + k, 3) and (3, j + k)
(3j, 3k) and (StartFraction 3 Over j EndFraction, StartFraction 3 Over k EndFraction)

The slash indicates a fraction.

Proof:

We'll need to consider 4 different cases.

Case (1): j > 0 and k > 0

If j > 0, then 3j > 0 and 3/j > 0

If k > 0, then 3k > 0 and 3/k > 0

The two points (3j, 3k) and (3/j, 3/k) are both in quadrant 1.

Case (2): j > 0 and k < 0

If j > 0, then 3j > 0 and 3/j > 0

If k < 0, then 3k < 0 and 3/k < 0

Points (3j, 3k) and (3/j, 3/k) are both in quadrant 4.

Case (3): j < 0 and k > 0

If j < 0, then 3j < 0 and 3/j < 0

If k > 0, then 3k > 0 and 3/k > 0

Points (3j, 3k) and (3/j, 3/k) are in quadrant 3.

Case (4): j < 0 and k < 0

If j < 0, then 3j < 0 and 3/j < 0

If k < 0, then 3k < 0 and 3/k < 0

Points (3j, 3k) and (3/j, 3/k) are in quadrant 4.

For nonzero integers j and k, we've shown that Points (3j, 3k) and (3/j, 3/k) are in the same quadrant. This concludes the proof.

a net is a diagram that shows a “flattened” view of a solid. in a net, each face and base is shown with all of its dimensions. a net can also serve as a pattern to build a three-dimensional solid.

a pyramid is a three-dimensional object with a base that is a polygon and triangular faces that meet at one vertex.

" the net of a triangular pyramid consists of four triangles. the base here we are given of the pyramid is a equilateral   triangle, and the lateral faces are also triangles "

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for