Winona wants to add the numbers 1 2 + 2 3 + 3 2 . She first added 1 2 and 3 2 , then added the result to 2 3 . What reason supports why Winona can do this?

Associative property

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

½ + ⅔ + 3/2

Required

What reason supports Winona's process?

This question could be better answered, if supported with options; however, since there's none, I'll provide my answer on a general rule.

Winona's process can be supported by associative property of algebra which implies that

a + b + c = (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) = (a + c) + b

So, when Winona added ½ to 3/2, it is represented by a + c

And when she added the result to ⅔, it is represented by (a + c) + b

Hence, we can conclude that Winona applied associative property

hey there!

if she's saving for six months, let's divide the total number we need for the trip by six, dividing it into the amount that needs to be saved for each month.

500 ÷ 6 =

she needs to save at least this amount each month, so we should use this symbol: ≥

let x be the amount she saves each month.

your final answer is x ≥

hope this !

answer: this is not a question

step-by-step explanation: this is a answer