Jennifer says the quadrilaterals below must be congruent because their angles are congruent. Is she correct?

I've attached the complete question withe the 2 quadrilaterals.

Jennifer is not correct because equal angles alone is not a proof of congruency.

Step-by-step explanation:

Now, in test for congruence, we use any of the following criteria;

SSS: Side - Side - Side

SAS: Side - Angle - Side

ASA: Angle - Side - Angle

AAS: Angle - Angle - Side

RHS: Right angle - Hypotenuse - Side

The assumption in the question is that all the angles are equal to determine that the quadrilaterals are congruent.

However, we don't use AAA(Angle - Angle - Angle theorem) as a congruence proof because it's very possible to have all the internal angles equal and yet all the corresponding sides don't have the same length.

Thus, Jeniffer is not correct.

can you rephrase the question ? it is unclear : -)

step-by-step explanation:

to find the perimeter of the rectangle this is the expression:

x-9+x-9+3x-4+3x-4=138

if we simplify it:

8x-26=138

remember, 138 is what it all adds up to

the length is 11.5cm

the width is 57.5cm

the area is 661.25cm^2

the answers might not be correct use at own risk