Which table of ordered pairs represents a proportional relationship? A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 3, negative 4, negative 5. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 3, 2, 1.
A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 1, negative 3, negative 5. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 1, 3, 5.
A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 2, negative 4, negative 6. Column 2 is labeled y with entries negative 5, negative 7, negative 9.
A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 2, negative 3, negative 4. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 0, negative 1, negative 2.

A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 14, 28, 42. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 2, 4, 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

Examining the response options:

A 2- compartment chart with 3 rows. Column 1 is designated x with records 1, 5, 6. compartment 2 is designated y with records 5, 20, 30.

No, as y = 25 not 20 and x = 5 .

A 2- compartment chart with 3 rows. Column 1 is identified x with approaches 48, 32, 16. compartment 2 is designated y with listings 4, 2, 1.

No, y =64 not 48 and x= 4.

A 2- compartment chart with 3 lines. compartment 1 is designated x with records 0, 1, 3. compartment 2 is designated y with records 90, 70, 25.

No, y= 25+3*45= 160 not 90 and x = 3.

A 2- compartment chart with 3 lines. compartment 1 is designated x with records 42, 28, 14. compartment 2 is designated y with records 2, 4, 6.

Yes, as 2*7 = 14, 4*7= 28, 6*7= 42.

actually your concept is wrong

step-by-step explanation:

150% of x =300

150x=300×100

x=(300×100)÷150

x=200