Henry says that his set of numbers includes all integers. Iliana argues that he is wrong. Left-brace negative 15, negative 5, negative one-half, 0, 2, 16 Right-brace Which is the best way to explain why Iliana is correct? Iliana is correct because Henry included negative numbers. Negative numbers are not integers. Iliana is correct because Henry included a fraction. Fractions are not integers. Iliana is correct because Henry included zero. Zero is not an integer. Iliana is correct because Henry included a positive number. Positive numbers are not integers.

The answer is b

Step-by-step explanation:

Edge

answer: c, the green line

step-by-step explanation:

there is no black line, eliminate b.

simple interest implies periodic payments, but the red line shows no payments, eliminate d.

simple interest has equal payments. if paid say every day, the graph is about a straight line (actually a stairstep).

the yellow line is not straight, eliminate a.

check: the green line is straight, answer is c.

simple interest with positive interest rate gives a straight line sloping up to the right. green line:

g(t) = $100 + ($200-$100) ÷ (20 years) × (t years)

= $100 + (4%/year) × ($100)(t years)

incidentally, the yellow line curving upward represents continuously compounded interest

y = $100 × 2^(t years / (14 assuming the yellow line hits $200 at 14 years. 2^0 is 1, so y(0) = $100; 2^(14/14) is 2, so y(14) = $200.

its a trick question

step-by-step explanation:

dogs love water, just turn on the hose and it will run in circles chasing the water all day : )