Paula says that 2/3 is equivalent to 4/9 because 4 is a multiple of 2 and 9 is a multiple of 3. explain her error.

Paula is wrong because, in order to be equivalent, the nominator and denominator of a fraction must have to be multiplied by the same number.

Step-by-step explanation:

Paula is wrong because, in order to be equivalent, the nominator and denominator of a fraction must have to be multiplied by the same number.

4/9 is basically obtained when we multiply the denominator of 2/3 by 2 and denominator by 3, which is wrong.

Thus, the correction is as follows:

Given the fraction

Multiply the nominator and denominator of the fraction by 2

Thus, the 4/6 is the correct equivalent expression of 2/3.

an advantage of the standard deviation is that it increases as the dispersion of the data increases. e. the interquartile range is preferred when the data are not skewed or no have outliers. an advantage of the standard deviation is that it uses all the observations in its computation.

step-by-step explanation:

6.48/4 4 goes into 6.48 1.62 times