Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6,-10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect

Complete Question:

{(–9, 1), (–5, 2), (0, 7), (1, 3), (6, –10)} Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6, –10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect.

A. (–10, –10)

B. (–9, –6)

C. (–5, 1)

D. (1, 12)

E. (4, 7)

Step-by-step explanation:

A relation is represented as:

Where

For a relation to be a function, the domain must be unique and must not be repeated.

In the given function,

The domains are

So, if (6,-10) is to be replaced;

The domain of the ordered pair that will replace it must not be any of

From the list of given options:

The above can not replace (6,-10) because their domain exist already.

idk sry

step-by-step explanation:

i dony know

step-by-step explanation: