100 points! Romantic writers rejected the logical style of writers from the age of reason and instead focused on individual experiences, thoughts, and emotions. Romantic literature used lofty, expressive language to highlight a particular mood and message. What do you think these techniques offered to romantic writers that previous styles did not? Consider the romantic literature you have read. Do you think these techniques and styles were effective for the themes and subjects being addressed? Why or why not?

Step-by-step explanation:

Romantic writers have the advantage of writing what they feel not just what they made up. Romantic writers can make a book sad, scary, and happy. Whereas fictional books almost always end up perfect for the main character. I do think that the techniques and styles were effective for the themes and subjects being addressed because they flow into the subject. Using an absolute sob story for a romantic book could be passed off as a hit if you use the right techniques. So, yes. I do think that the techniques and styles were effective for the themes and subjects being addressed.

Romantic writers have the advantage of being able to write what they are feeling rather than what they have made up. Romantic authors have the ability to make a novel sad, terrifying, or joyous. Fictional literature, on the other hand, virtually always wind up being great for the protagonist. Because the tactics and styles flow into the issue, I believe they were successful for the themes and subjects being covered. If you employ the correct strategies, an extreme sob tale for a romance book may be passed off as a hit. As a result, sure. I believe the approaches and styles were appropriate for the themes and matters discussed.

Step-by-step explanation:

i can't read the graph

step-by-step explanation: