A utility company burns coal to generate electricity. The cost of removing a certain percent of the pollutants from the smokestack emissions is typically not function. That isif it costs C dollars to remove 25% of the pollutants. would cost more than dollars to remove 50% of the pollutants. As the percent of removed pollutants approaches 100 %, the cost tends to become pro . Suppose that the cost C (in dollars) of removing p % of the smokestack pollutants

A utility company burns coal to generate electricity. ... b) Find where the function is undefined. c) Interpret the meaning of the vertical asymptote. As the company attempts to remove higher amounts of the pollutants, the cost rises, and ... and they will successfully be able to remove 100% of the pollutants.

Step-by-step explanation:That is, if it costs dollars to remove 25% of the pollutants, it would cost more than ... The cost (in dollars) of removing percent of the smokestack pollutants is given by ... How much additional expense is the new law asking the utility company to ... The graph of this function is shown in Figure 3.56. ... C 80,000 85 100 85 p 100.

f(x) = - 2/3x + 5; f(5/2)

substitute 5/2 in for x:

f(5/2) = -2/3(5/2) + 5

simplify the right side:

f(5/2) = -5/3 + 5

f(5/2) = 10/3

answer:

f(5/2) = 10/3

i hope this you!

sine

step-by-step explanation: