subject
Mathematics, 04.02.2021 14:00 droidd133

Ricardo throws a stone off a bridge into a river below. The stone's height (in meters above the water), x seconds after Ricardo threw it, is modeled by w(x) = -5(1 -8 )(x + 4)
What is the maximum height that the stone will reach?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:00
() (98 points)to be fair, you have to have a very high iq to understant the jokes in rick and morty. the humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. there's also rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from narodnaya volya literature, for instance. the fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about life. as a consequence people who dislike rick & morty truly are idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in rick's existential catchphrase "wubba lubba dub dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to turgenev's russian epic fathers and sons. i'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as dan harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. what fools.. how i pity them. and yes, by the way, i do have a rick & morty tattoo. and no, you cannot see it. it's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 iq points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. nothin personnel kid
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
What is the difference between the predicted value and the actual value
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
Which one is true about the hexagons ?
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Ricardo throws a stone off a bridge into a river below. The stone's height (in meters above the wate...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.07.2019 02:30
Questions on the website: 13722359