Ryobi has a budget of $7200 for 80 chairs. They can buy leather chairs for $125 each, mesh chair for $100 each, and fabric chairs for $175 each. They want to have three times as many fabric chairs as leather chairs. How many of each chair should they buy?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

If f(x) = 2x - 6 and g(x) = 3x + 9, find (f - g)(x). a. (f-g)(x) = x + 15 o o b. (f- g)(x) = -x - 15 o c. (f- g)(x) = 5x + 3 o d. (f- g)(x) = -x+3 submit

1. which of the following algebraic equations is equivalent to ? x^n = a a^n = x a^x = n x^a = n 2. 16^1/4= 1/2 2 4 3. (-36)^1/2= -6 1/6 no real number 4. 8^2/3= 4 8 16√2 )^5/2= 7,776 1/7,776 no real number 6. m ^ the square root of a^2m simplified is: 7. the square root of 3^3 times the square root of 2 simplified and in radical form is: