There are 250 bricks used to build a wall that is 20 feet high how many bricks will be used to build a wall is 40 feet high?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Will mark brainliest if you answer ! the taco shop sold 198 lunches friday. this number is 3 more than 3 times the number they sold monday. let n represent the number of lunches sold monday. which equation shows an equality between two different ways of expressing the number of lunches sold on friday? a. n – 3 = 198 b. 3n – 3 = 198 c. 3n + 3 = 198 d. n + 3 = 198

What expression is equivalent to 1/2(2+3x-6)