N' + 18n + 65 = 0
3
a
what are the steps

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The two-way table shows the number of people whose hobbies are reading or solving puzzles and who either ride a motorcycle or don’t ride a motorcycle. among people whose hobby is reading, what is the relative frequency of not riding a motorcycle? express your answer as a decimal, and round it to the nearest hundredth if necessary. enter your answer in the box. reading solving puzzles ride a motorcycle 7 3 don't ride a motorcycle 5 9

How can the correlation in the scatter plot graph below best be described? positive correlation negative correlation both positive and negative no correlation