Jin​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The graph below shows the line of best fit for data collected on the number of cell phones in cell phone cases sold at the local electronic store on four different days

The temperature of a chemical solution is originally 21 ? c . a chemist heats the solution at a constant rate, and the temperature of the solution 75 ? c after 1212 12 minutes of heating. the temperature, tt t , of the solution in ? c is a function of x , the heating time in minutes. write the function's formula.