In the study of pesticide use and breast cancer, researchers evaluated pesticide use during the entire life of the respondents. How would you expect the results to have been affected if the researchers collected exposure history spanning the previous 20 years only?

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

A common problem with most research designs is bias, which could be introduced win several ways one if which is the favored selection of certain variables rather than being randomized. In the scenario above, the sampling time frame introduces a bias into the design as the tune span of pesticide use does not allay with that of the exposure history of the respondent. Therefore an entire lifetime evaluation of one variable and just 20 years evaluation of the other introduces a sampling bias into the research design. Similarly, evaluation the type of pesticide usage over certain time period may need to be considered as the effect of very old pesticides may differ from those used very recently.

i think it is everything has to equal 180 so, if i correct 4=c. 6=d. 8=a. 7=b. and the last question would be c. because they are parallel lines and they are congruent.

step-by-step explanation:

the reason everything has to equal to 180 is because that is how it works. i'm guessing that is its rule. 4 and 8 are congruent and parallel so, that would be 30+30 because they have the same number. it would equal 60. 6 and 7 are congruent and parallel so, that would be 30+30 because they have the same number. it would equal 60. 60+60 is 180. so, now you have your answer