At a manufacturing company, the percent of defective items produced on the assembly line is 2%. The company is testing a new assembly line designed to reduce the percent of defective parts. The null and alternative hypotheses of the test are described as follows.
H : The percent of defective parts is at least 2%.
H : The percent of defective parts is less than 2%.
Which of the following describes a Type II error that could result from the test?
A) The test does not provide convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 3%.
Submit
B
The test does not provide convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 2%
C) The test does not provide convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 1%.
D
The test provides convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 2%
E
The test provides convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 1%.

C. the test does not provide convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 1%

Step-by-step explanation:

A Type II error occurs if a false null hypothesis is not rejected. In this case, the new assembly line does reduce the percent of defective items, but the test fails to detect it.

C. The test does not provide convincing evidence that the percent is less than 2%, but the actual percent is 1%.

Step-by-step explanation:

A Type II error occurs if a false null hypothesis is not rejected. In this case, the new assembly line does reduce the percent of defective items, but the test fails to detect it.

example 2 – simplify: step 1: completely factor both the numerators and denominators of all fractions. step 2: change the division sign to a multiplication sign and flip (or reciprocate) the fraction after the division sign; essential you need to multiply by the reciprocal. step 3 : cancel or reduce the fractions.

kbmflmklbhml; bmlzb; bdhzz

step-by-step explanation: