Help as soon as possible What error did Stefan make in his conclusion?
A. Stefan didn’t use only rigid transformations so the figures aren’t congruent
B. It is possible to map ABD to ABC using a sequence of rigid transformations but the figures aren’t congruent
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion

30

step-by-step explanation:

times by times

dilation scale factor 2: starting with δabc, draw the dilation image of the triangle with a center at the origin and a scale factor of two. notice that every coordinate of the original triangle has been multiplied by the scale factor (x2). dilation with scale factor 2, multiply by 2.

hello, sorry being so rude after all that fighting i found it kind of funny, so as me saying sorry here is an answer!

since the table showed her that   2km = 2000m.

to determine, how many km in 2000m, she would divide by 1000.

= 2000 / 1000 = 2 km.

similarly, for 8000m = 8000 / 1000 = 8 km

cheers to savings

~

your pal papaguy

1. 2

2. 11

3. 5

4. 6

5. 7

6. 5

7. -1

8. 1

step-by-step explanation: