What is the total surface area??

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Triangle inequality theorem state if each set of three numbers can be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. 1. 9, 8, 22. 2. 5,10,12. 3. 7,10,22. 4. 4,11,12. 5. 11,9,10. 6. 10,4,19. 7. 3,12,10. 8. 4,3,2. 9. 6,5,13. 10. 7,12,20. me .

Angle xyz is formed by segments xy and yz on the coordinate grid below: a coordinate plane is shown. angle xyz has endpoints at 3 comma negative 1 and 6 negative 2 and 3 comma negative 3 and measures 36.87 degrees. angle xyz is rotated 270 degrees counterclockwise about the origin to form angle x′y′z′. which statement shows the measure of angle x′y′z′?