Assume that you have the following incomplete information about three previous independent-samples experiments that were conducted. In Experiment A, Sample 1 had 75 participants and a variance of 12.45, whereas Sample 2 had 25 participants and a variance of 7.55. In Experiment B, Sample 1 had 25 participants and a variance of 12.45, whereas Sample 2 had 75 participants and a variance of 7.55. In Experiment C, Sample 1 had 50 participants and a variance of 12.45, whereas Sample 2 had 50 participants and a variance of 7.55. In which experiment would you be more likely to reject the null hypothesis

The only way to identify an intercept is as an ordered pair. true false

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

X² + 4y² = 36 the major axis runs along: a) y=4x b) x-axis c) y-axis