Which is best?? killing family, friends and relatives to save the world
or
destroying the world to save family ,friends, relatives and to make a new world..​

option a bc I don't have friends ;-;, and distant relatives prolly don't count

killing relatives

Step-by-step explanation:

I think it would just be betree for the world

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!

answer: 2 answers

step-by-step explanation: the first one means to spread the product throughout the marketplace such that a large number of people can buy it.  

the second means the process of making a product or service available for the consumer or business user that needs it.

mark this brainliest and i will be glad to .