Answers: 3
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:30
Triangle jkl was dilated using the rule dm, 1/3 the image, triangle j’ k’ l’ is the result of the dilation. a.5 units b.7.5 units c.10 units d.12.5 units
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:40
What is the approximate circumference of the circle shown below?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:00
How many different triangles can be constructed with the angle measurements of 134° 10° and 36° ?
Answers: 3
Does anyone want this account?...
Mathematics, 21.10.2019 22:30
History, 21.10.2019 22:30
English, 21.10.2019 22:30
Physics, 21.10.2019 22:30
History, 21.10.2019 22:30
Biology, 21.10.2019 22:30
Geography, 21.10.2019 22:30
History, 21.10.2019 22:30
History, 21.10.2019 22:30
Biology, 21.10.2019 22:30