Daniel believes that in a given conficence interval the researchers should change the confidence level from 98% to 99% so that they can get a more narrow margin with which to "pin down" the true population mean. You disagree with Daniel. What is the basis for your argument against Daniel's suggestion

henry ordered 5 large pizzas

step-by-step explanation:

sorry no step by step

answer: 4 meters

step-by-step explanation: to you understand 2/3 better you can do 1 divided by 3 = . then multiply that by the 2 which is .66666666666666667 then you would do 6 x .66666666666666667 which is 4.      

hope this .

the number of possible outcomes that do not show a 1 on the first spinner and show the number 4 on the second spinner is 2.

spinner 1 spinner 2

1                     1

1                     2

1                     3

1                     4

2                   1

2                   2

2                   3

2                   4   = not 1, and 4

3                   1

3                   2

3                   3

3                   4 = not 1, and 4

only 2 outcomes have passed the given condition.

step-by-step explanation:

multiple all that

step-by-step explanation:

27×17