Write a problem you can use to make a table strategy to solve then solve the problem

A Cadillac travels at 70 mph. A Buick travels at 60 mph. How long does it take to a Cadillac to catch up the Buick that started travelling one hour earlier?

Step-by-step explanation:

A Table strategy needs an understanding of the problem. In addition to this strategy provides a clear vision of the problem.

Let's write it in a row, for the Cadillac. The second one for the Buick.

Plugging in values, here it is a Table like

Since the smallest distance between them is given in 6 hours, (10 miles). This is clearly the answer.

Each movement can be described as a function the Cadillac

y=70x

And the Buick: y=60x

And plugging values for x, you can test it alternatively than using table strategy.

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

investment b is an ordinary annuity with $3,909.64 in the account after one year.

step-by-step explanation: