Giving brainliest answer if give a detailed answer thnx so much! tyler has $1000 that he wants to put in a savings account. he wants to save the money for 6 years. after 6 years he plans to take the money out and spend it on college. he looks at two different banks, and they offer him different interest options.

bank a offers tyler 4% simple interest. how much would tyler’s investment be worth after 6 years in this account? show your calculations below.

bank b offers tyler 3% interest compounded annually. how much would tyler’s investment be worth after 6 years in this account? show your calculations below.

in which bank should tyler place the $1000 he is saving for college?

I only know the answer to the first : ( sorry. the answer to the first in detail ; ) is Tyler's $1,000 investment will be worth $1,240 after 6 years, invested at 4% interest rate. The problem gives the following relevant data: Principal = $1000Interest rate = 4% simple interest Term or time period = 6 years Since simple interest is given, we need to use the simple interest formula; I = P x R x T where: P is the principal, R is the interest rate, and T is the time the money will be invested. I = $1000 x 4% x 6yrsI = $1000 x 0.04 x 6I = 40 x 6I = 240  Interest earned after 6 years is $240.Total Investment = Principal + Interest x T x I = $1,000 + $240 x T x I = $1,240  the value of Tyler's investment after 6 years.

answer: plz give a pic and answer choices so i can answer!

step-by-step explanation:

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: