Complete the bubble may by using the words with a?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Toyland is having a sale. all items are 20% off. how much will you save on an item that usually sells for 95$ explain your

Choose a second initial value that is 0.01 greater than the initial value from question 9. iterate it using the function, f, ten times. if necessary, you can round your results to the nearest ten-thousandth.