Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = 3.5x? it does not, the points shown on the line would not be part of y = 3.5x. it does not, proportions cannot be represented on a graph. it does, the points shown on the line would be part of y = 3.5x. it does, all proportions can be shown on the graph of this line.

It does, the points shown on the line would be part of

Step-by-step explanation:

see the attached figure to better understand the problem  

we know that

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form or

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

In this problem we have

The slope is equal to ------> is a positive slope

The line passes through the origin

therefore

This linear equation represent a proportional variation

Verify the values of the points of the graph with the equation

For

-----> is correct

For

-----> is correct

y= -

answer: a

step-by-step explanation:

if xy ~ yz therefore xy would be the same length as yz