subject
Mathematics, 05.05.2021 07:30 masontdavis

An animal's weight is proportional to its volume. The strength in its legs to support its weight is proportional to their cross-sectional area. Imagine magnifying a mouse to the size of an elephant. If its length is multiplied by 65, and its density and proportions stay the same, what are the multipliers for its weight and the cross-sectional areas for its legs? Would a mouse this size be able to support itself? Complete the explanation. The ratio of leg cross-section to weight has been reduced by a factor of . The mouse (would not/ would) be able to support itself.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:00
If h(x) = f[tex]h(x) = f[/tex] ° [tex]g) (x)[/tex] and [tex]h(x) = \sqrt[3]{x+3}[/tex], find [tex]g(x)[/tex] if [tex]f(x) = \sqrt[3]{x +2}[/tex] ·
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
You are at a restaurant and owe $56.20 for your meal. you want to leave an 18% tip. approximately how much is your tip?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Someone me! if you’re smart you can solve this!
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
How do you write something in scientific notation?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
An animal's weight is proportional to its volume. The strength in its legs to support its weight is...
Questions
question
History, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Mathematics, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Mathematics, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Mathematics, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Geography, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Mathematics, 25.10.2020 05:50
question
Chemistry, 25.10.2020 05:50
Questions on the website: 13722363