I need help ASAP with my geometry hw please help

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Three coins are flipped. what is the probability that there will be at least two tails?

What is the percentile for data value 6 in the following data set? 4 13 8 6 4 4 13 6 4 13 2 13 15 5 9 4 12 8 6 13 40 25 35 62