subject
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:20 northsidehotboy

Maggie claims that if you restrict the domain of function f(x)=x2−4 to be x≥−2, then the function is invertible and the inverse function is f−1(x)=x+4−−−−−√. Which statement provides a correct analysis of Maggie's claim?
A
The claim is correct because when the domain of f(x) is restricted to x≥−2 the function is invertible.

B
The claim is incorrect because in order for f(x) to be invertible and its inverse to be f−1(x)=x+4−−−−−√ the domain must be restricted to x≥0.

C
The claim is incorrect because in order for f(x) to be invertible and its inverse to be f−1(x)=x+4−−−−−√ the domain must be restricted to x≥−4.

D
The claim is incorrect because there is not a domain restriction that can be applied to f(x) to make the function invertible.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:30
125 tickets were sold for the jazz band concert for a total of $1,022. students tickets cost $6 each, and general admission tickets cost $10 each. how many of each kind of tickets were sold?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
If f(x) =3x-2 and g(x) =2x+1 fins (f+ g) (x)
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
Iam a rectangle. my perimeter is 60 feet. how much are do i cover?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
26) -2(7x) = (-2 • 7) x a. associative property of addition b. associative property of multiplication c. commutative property of multiplication d. commutative property of addition
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Maggie claims that if you restrict the domain of function f(x)=x2−4 to be x≥−2, then the function is...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:43
question
History, 18.04.2020 02:44
Questions on the website: 13722360