Help please ! :(
I don’t really understand it quite well, can someone help ?

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Jim had 3,067.48 in his checking account he wrote a check to pay for two airplane tickets. his account now has 1,845.24.

Arectangular garden is 5 feet long and 3 feet wide. a second rectangular garden has dimensions that are double the dimensions of the first garden. what is the percent of change in perimeter from the first garden to the second garden?