Jonathon states that the inequality graphed on the number line below represents the solution set of the number of windows he needs to wash in order to buy the boxed set. Do you agree with Jonathon? Explain why or why not. If you do not agree with Jonathon, explain how you would change the graph such that it correctly models the number of windows he needs to wash in order to buy the boxed set.

7,24

step-by-step explanation:

sorry man i accidentally pressed yes my bad

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.