A researcher studying a memory enhancing technique had participants memorize nonsense words and definitions. Out of a list of 10 words, 57 participants were able to quickly learn 6.24 words on average with a standard deviation of 1.24. If it is known the mean number of words memorized in general is 5.65, is there sufficient evidence at that the memory enhancing technique helped participants learn more words? a. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
b. What is the value of the test statistic?
c. What is the critical value?
d. What is the decision?
e. What is the conclusion?

A.

Null:

H0: u= 5.65

Alternative:

H1: u > 5.65

B.

The test statistic

Xbar = 6.24

u = 5.65

S = 1.24

N = 57

T = 6.24-5.65/(1.24/√57)

= 0.59/(1.24/7.5498)

= 0.59/0.1642

Test statistic = 3.593

C.

With alpha = 0.05

Df = n-1 = 57-1 = 56

T critical = 1.673

D.

If t test > 1.673 reject the null hypothesis

3.593>1.673, reject the null hypothesis

We conclude that there is enough evidence that the technique helped the participants to learn more.

they disappear if your absent from to long. i found out that the hard way.

step-by-step explanation:

brainliest lol i just need one more brainliest.

its the second choice.

step-by-step explanation:

the elements in the range will be 7 less than the elements in the domain.