Methods of statistics show that if a vegetarian diet had no effect on blood pressure, there would be less than 1 chance in 100 of getting these results. Does the result have statistical significance? Why or why not? Does the result have practical significance?

hi your question is incomplete  below is the complete question

The result has a statistical significance because from the results obtained from the sample of people whom followed vegetarian diet and the people whom followed non-vegetarian diet we can see the different effects on blood pressure.

The result has a practical significance because the large difference in mean values.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sample size = 85 followed a vegetarian diet

Period =  4 months,

Mean systolic blood pressure=  124 mmHg

Sample size = 75 followed non-vegetarian diet

Period = 4 months

Mean systolic Bp = 138 mmHg

Reasons/explanations

Given that p -value < 0.01  we will reject the null hypothesis

The result has a statistical significance because from the results obtained from the sample of people whom followed vegetarian diet and the people whom followed non-vegetarian diet we can see the different effects on blood pressure.

The result has a practical significance because the large difference in mean values.

true

explanation:

option (b) is correct

step-by-step explanation:

to find the solution of this system, we need to convert it into reduced row-echelon form. we have,

after applying row operations r2 -> r2/2 and r3 -> r3/3, we get,