Companies are starting to use 360-degree surveys to evaluate the performance of their employees. This approach uses annonymous feedback from a variety of people who work closely with the employee. People who fill out the survey could be coworkers, supervisors, subordinates, or even customers. It is different from a traditional performance review, which relies only on feedback from an employee's supervisor. Many prefer the 360-degree approach because it provides a more well-rounded perspective on how the employee performs in their job role. Supervisers can be biased because they do not interact with the employee in the same way that a customer or co-worker might. However, the 360-degree survey approach still relies only on subjective feedback, which does not always give a fair representation of the employee's work?