WHY DOES NO ONE ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?? Its kinda annoying that i answer others' questions but no one answers mine. Well if anyone feels like helping me heres my question: A mathematician reported the results from a particular experiment to the researcher who conducted it. The report states that on one specific part of the experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.21. Based on this p-value, what should the researcher conclude?

The test was not statistically significant because 2 × 0.21 = 0.42, which is less than 0.5.
The test was statistically significant because a p-value of 0.21 is greater than a significance level of 0.05.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
The test was statistically significant because p = 1 − 0.21 = 0.79, which is greater than a significance level of 0.05.

The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.

Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?

chase is right because he already been to the swings and he know how far it will be to get there

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

the triangles are similar. therefore the corresponding sides are in proportion:

              cross multiply

            divide both sides by 32