I have picture of it

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Ibeg you to me 20. a reaction produces 4.93 l of oxygen, but was supposed to produce 1 mol of oxygen. what is the percent yield?

Aaron invested a total of $4,100, some in an account earning 8% simple interest, and the rest in an account earning 5% simple interest. how much did he invest in each account if after one year he earned $211 in interest? select one: a. $200 at 8%, $3,900 at 5% b. $3,200 at 8%, $900 at 5% c. $900 at 8%, $3,200 at 5% d. $3,900 at 8%, $200 at 5%