Answers: 3
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
Angela took a general public aptitude test and scored in the 88th percentile for aptitude in accounting. what percentage of the scores were at or below her score?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
Corresponding angles are a. always b. sometimes c. never congruent
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:40
Point b lies between points a and c on . let x represent the length of segment ab in inches. use the segment to complete the statements. the value of x is . the length of in inches is . the length of in inches is .
Answers: 3
Through: (5, 4) and (0,5)...
Biology, 23.12.2021 01:00
Social Studies, 23.12.2021 01:00
Physics, 23.12.2021 01:00
Biology, 23.12.2021 01:00
SAT, 23.12.2021 01:00
SAT, 23.12.2021 01:00