In this course, we have studied two types of geometry: Euclidean and analytical. In Euclidean geometry, we’ve explored the relationships between points, lines, and planes without any numerical measurement.
In analytical geometry, we’ve explored the relationship between algebra and geometry using positions of points in a Cartesian coordinate system.
Which approach to geometry do you prefer and why? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would be more beneficial than the other?

square pyramid

step-by-step explanation:

square prism looks like nothing like that

triangular prism has a rectangular base instead of a square base

tetrahedron has a triangular base

answer: answer: d) v= 1/6 bh  

step-by-step explanation:

since according to the given question,   a pyramid is placed inside a prism.

step-by-step explanation:

option: d is the correct answer.

d) none of the above.

step-by-step explanation:

clearly from the figure attached to the question we could see that there is no shape given. hence without any shape given in the figure and after rotation we can't obtained a square pyramid.

since, to obtain a image we need a proper figure of the pre-image so that it can be transformed.

hence, the correct answer is:

d) none of the above.

step-by-step explanation:

the answer is a if my teacher taught me correct