In an effort to reduce cost on auto insurance, sophia has lowered each component of her current plan to the cheapest possible option. sophia’s current insurance agency is fret-no-more auto insurance, whose policy options are listed below. the annual premium for sophia’s current policy is $511.31. what decrease in her annual premium will sophia see after the change?
fret-no-more auto insurance
type of insurance coverage
coverage limits
annual premiums
bodily injury
$25/50,000
$21.35
$50/100,000
$32.78
$100/300,000
$42.10
property damage
$25,000
$115.50
$50,000
$142.44
$100,000
$193.78
collision
$100 deductible
$490.25
$250 deductible
$343.33
$500 deductible
$248.08
comprehensive
$50 deductible
$105.79
$100 deductible
$88.23
a.
$20.59
b.
$38.15
c.
$57.10
d.
$60.88

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

c = 0.429t

step-by-step explanation:

the constant rate at which carlos harvests cassava is 35 minutes per 15 cassavas 15/35 = 0.429 cassava per minute

therefore, an equation that models the number of cassava (c) that harvest carlos in a time (t) is the following:

where t is the time in minutes.

this means that when 35 minutes have elapsed 15 cassava have been harvested, at 70 minutes 30 cassava have been harvested and so on.

you'll have to attache the image of the bar graph in order for us to answer : )

step-by-step explanation: