subject
Mathematics, 24.10.2021 05:40 muhammadcorley123456

Part B Jason claims that the value of s - r must be greater than the value of s - 9. His reasoning is that r is closer to zero than q.
• Explain why Jason's claim and reasoning are incorrect.
• Provide a correct claim and reasoning, explaining how the distances of r and q from zero support your reasoning.
Respond in the space provided.


Part B

Jason claims that the value of s - r must be greater than the value of s - 9. His reasonin

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:00
A20? -foot ladder is placed against a vertical wall of a? building, with the bottom of the ladder standing on level ground 19 feet from the base of the building. how high up the wall does the ladder? reach?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:50
Write the linear inequality shown in the graph. the gray area represents the shaded region. y> -3y+5 y> 3x-5 y< -3x+5 y< 3x-5
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
5(-9w) put expression in distributive property
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
The final cost of a sale is determined by multiplying the price on the tag by 75%. which best describes the function that represents the situation?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Part B Jason claims that the value of s - r must be greater than the value of s - 9. His reasoning...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.09.2019 11:00
Questions on the website: 13722367