Mrs. Kuryvial does not believe that a 7th grade math student can solve the following problem -5 1/3*-2 2/5. Please explain how to solve this problem step by step to prove Mrs. Kuryvial wrong

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The class wants to raise a total of $750.if they receive a profit of $1.25 from each candybar sold, how many bars must they sell to reachtheir goal

Which equation represents the model shown? a)1/3 divide 1/6 = 2 b)2/3 divide 1/6 = 2/18 c)1/3 divide 1/6 = 1/18 d)2/3 divide 1/6 =4